Haas is braced for a disrupted Miami GP weekend as Formula 1 moves closer to resolving ongoing concerns around energy management.
Talks between the FIA, F1, and the teams have continued through April following issues seen in the opening rounds.
Any agreed changes to energy deployment or harvesting will require revised software from power unit suppliers. For Haas, that responsibility sits with Ferrari.
A technical meeting on 16 April explored potential solutions, with a further high-level discussion scheduled for 20 April to decide on preferred options.
Any outcome must then be approved by the World Motor Sport Council before implementation, which is targeted for the Miami weekend in early May.
Miami hosts a Sprint format, leaving teams with just one hour of practice before parc fermé conditions begin.
That limited track time usually focuses on car set-up rather than experimentation. However, Haas says that could change if new power unit software is introduced in time.
How this affects Haas
Head of car engineering, Hoagy Nidd, explained that understanding any updates will become a key focus.
“It is an interesting one and quite pertinent to the coming few weeks with the meetings that are going on this week,” Nidd said.
He outlined the position Haas faces as a customer team, relying on Ferrari for its power unit supply.
“Obviously, as a customer team, you are always the recipient of that, and previously in my career, I was in works teams. I was at Mercedes for 11 years, I was on the power unit side at Ferrari, and of course, the nature of being a customer team is that you have to get what you’re given.
“There is an element of us being able to provide feedback, but we will never be the main priority; that’s just the reality of being a customer team.
“But we have an opportunity with our power unit partner to work pretty well; it is one of the better relationships I’ve ever seen in Formula 1.”
Nidd added that any changes to energy management will largely be handled by Ferrari, with Haas needing to adapt once updates arrive.
“But at the end of the day, you’ve got to race what you’re given, and with the additional complexity of the energy management in the early parts of the year.
“The changes to the energy management is something is more managed by our power unit partners, and they will come up with a strategy based on that, and they’ll have to introduce their software changes.”
Delayed updates complicate the situation
Delays to submission deadlines have given manufacturers more time to finalise and test revised code ahead of Miami. Once delivered, teams must assess how it impacts performance and race strategy.
“Some of the required submission dates for the software before [Miami] have been delayed a little, which will help all the manufacturers get code written and deployed and then actually test it.
“Once it gets through that phase, it will then come to us with extra work we need to do in understanding how it will affect our vehicle performance, it is not massive, but it does shift the priorities slightly when we get to [Miami].”
As a result, practice running in Miami may look different from a typical Sprint weekend, with teams balancing set-up work against software validation.
“You’ll probably see teams doing slightly different things in P1 than they would normally do, but in Miami, in parralel, we’re going to have to out and actually test the software and try to get through some different parts of the strategy, whether that is testing the boost, trying to look at the overtake and making sure the launch is okay.
“So there will definitely be some shifts in priorities across the whole grid.”
In reality, the late push to tweak energy management risks turning an already compressed Sprint weekend into a compromise exercise rather than a clean competitive showcase.
Discussion about this post