Motorsport Week
  • Formula 1
    • 2021 Formula 1 Calendar
    • 2021 Team/Driver Line-Up
    • Championship Standings
    • Quali/Race Results
  • Formula E
    • Championship Standings
    • Formula E Calendar
  • WRC
    • Championship Standings
    • WRC Calendar
  • MotoGP
    • 2021 Team/Rider Line-Up
    • Championship Standings
    • MotoGP Calendar
  • IndyCar
    • 2021 IndyCar Calendar
    • Championship Standings
  • WEC
    • WEC Calendar
  • More
    • IMSA
    • Formula 2
    • Formula 3
    • NASCAR
    • DTM
    • WSeries
    • Extreme E
    • Dakar
    • Technical Insight
    • Galleries
    • About/Contact
    • Privacy Policy
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • Register
  • Formula 1
    • 2021 Formula 1 Calendar
    • 2021 Team/Driver Line-Up
    • Championship Standings
    • Quali/Race Results
  • Formula E
    • Championship Standings
    • Formula E Calendar
  • WRC
    • Championship Standings
    • WRC Calendar
  • MotoGP
    • 2021 Team/Rider Line-Up
    • Championship Standings
    • MotoGP Calendar
  • IndyCar
    • 2021 IndyCar Calendar
    • Championship Standings
  • WEC
    • WEC Calendar
  • More
    • IMSA
    • Formula 2
    • Formula 3
    • NASCAR
    • DTM
    • WSeries
    • Extreme E
    • Dakar
    • Technical Insight
    • Galleries
    • About/Contact
    • Privacy Policy
No Result
View All Result
Motorsport Week

Tech Analysis: Will Tyson takes a look at the 2021 engine regs

by
3 years ago
0
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

I don’t like to make generalisations and sweeping assumptions but it would be fair to say that we tend to be quite divisive when it comes to having an opinion on almost anything at the moment. 

Sitting on the fence is boring afterall. So I suppose you might be a bit disappointed to hear that my thoughts are neutral on the highly anticipated 2021 preliminary engine regulations released last week.

Even after some reflection, I see positives and negatives in them; I have no overriding opinion on them; I understand the thinking behind them.

Before we get into the key details, it’s worth reminding ourselves that Liberty Media have created a team of people (with no less than Ross Brawn at the helm) to come up with ideas – that incorporate the views of all those with interests in F1 – to shape the future of the sport on the technical front. 

F1 must also start thinking sustainably too, as the Bernie Ecclestone regime has left the sport disjointed in so many areas. Some stability is needed to not only lure in new fans, teams/manufacturers and circuits, but also to retain the existing ones who are perhaps a little irritated with all too frequent knee-jerk reactions and half-arsed solutions.

The current engines are incredibly complex!

With this in mind, the new regulations were never going to be a complete overhaul on the ones we have now. Hybrid power is here to stay: not only is it road relevant, it’s also vastly more powerful than any other powertrain that has gone before it and a step back from this concept would look a bit daft. 

Road relevance in F1 is a popular debate, but for me it makes total sense. Put simply, car manufacturers are in F1 for its global advertising board, and there’s no better way of selling an automotive product than developing and utilising the technology inside it to racing success. 

If you’re buying a McLaren or a Ferrari or an Aston Martin (brands that are all currently involved in F1), you want to be driving around in something with racing pedigree to a certain extent. 

So here’s the main list of features:

– 1.6 litre, V6 Turbo Hybrid, revving to 18,000 rpm
– Prescriptive internal design parameters to restrict development costs and discourage extreme designs and running conditions
– Removal of the MGU-H; More powerful MGU-K with focus on manual driver deployment together with option to save up energy for tactical racing
– Single turbo with dimensional constraints and weight limits
– Standard energy store and control electronics
– High Level of external prescriptive design to allow easy engine/chassis/transmission swapping
– Tighter fuel regulations and limits on number of fuels used per season

At first glance not an awful lot has changed, which is true from an architectural perspective. Low capacity V6, turbocharged, hybrid technology: all the ingredients from the past four seasons that will continue to intrigue outside manufacturers (Ilmor and Cosworth are the latest to express an interest). 

The overall package will take up virtually the same amount of space within the car as it does now, so there is less to worry about regarding chassis integration and vehicle dynamics. 

Now onto the differences. Cost cutting has been at the forefront of recent meetings between teams and the FIA, and the 2021 rules reflect that too. The MGU-H – responsible for the harvesting of energy from the exhaust gases via the turbocharger at high speed – operates under extreme temperature and loading conditions and is thus an incredibly expensive part to develop. 

Current manufactuers aren't happy with the proposal

Mercedes were the first to find significant advantages in placing it in the middle of the V of the engine, separating the turbine and compressor sides of the turbo. Over the years Ferrari, Renault and Honda have followed suit to some degree. A lot of resources are thrown at it to ensure that it performs reliably, which over time has led to increasing complexity in this area. It is a huge deterrent for outsiders looking to enter the sport, which the sport’s governing body have duly recognised and have taken action by abolishing it. 

Noise levels will be given a boost thanks to the deletion of the MGU-H (which essentially limits the exhaust flow through the turbo) and also a higher rev limit, although the detail within that will once again lie in fuel flow restrictions. 

The current engines are allowed to reach 15,000rpm, but we never see (or indeed hear) this due to the maximum 100kg/hr fuel flow rate occurring from 12,500rpm upwards. If the FIA are sensible, we will be gaining a few more decibels and a slightly brighter tone from the engine in the future. This will have its own drawbacks though, which I will explain later.

Standard parts are also a big plus for smaller suppliers looking for a way in, and with them comes the ability to interchange different elements of the powertrain easily. This, coupled with the dimension and weight restrictions in certain areas, will allow teams to quickly swap to a different supplier if the circumstances arise. 

If the FIA are sensible, we will be gaining a few more decibels and a slightly brighter engine tone

However, delve into the details and it is easy to understand why Renault and Mercedes in particular are not in favour of the changes. Discussion surrounds the MGU-H once more: forming an integral part of the power unit, it is responsible for harvesting 60 per cent of the car’s electrical energy, which can then be stored, used to spool the turbo at low speed or be directed straight to the MGU-K. In essence, it is what makes these powerful engines with huge turbos so driveable and incredibly efficient. Ditching the ‘H’ would place extra reliance on the ‘K’ to accelerate the car, which generates less energy and would therefore have limited use.

The next issue regards the turbocharger. With constraints, I imagine it will be smaller than what we have now simply because it wouldn’t be possible to control the lag without the MGU-H. As there is a flow restriction through the turbine, the rotational speed will be slower and the compressor will not be able to pull in as much air. This will significantly alter the lean burn combustion process and we haven’t yet considered the higher rev limit.

Might we see more failures with higher revs?

Additional revs are all well and good but with them comes higher fuel burn. The cars will have to carry more fuel from the start of the race, which on top of the Halo, wider tyres and longer wheelbases will make them pretty burly to say the least. 

Furthermore, the engine components will have to deal with the higher heat and stresses that come with running at a faster speed, and more durability normally equates to more weight. More mass is less efficient and, in my opinion, considerably hampers racing. 

And then there’s the biggest argument of them all, presented recently by Ferrari, which is uniqueness. While many other racing series’ utilise standard parts very well, F1 should be careful not to head too far down this path. The individuality of the engineering in the cars is part of what makes the sport so appealing – you don’t even have to fully understand the technical side of the sport to know that. Personally I’d rather see a budget cap than a standardising frenzy, but that’s another debate for another time. 

What happens now? More discussion I suspect, as the FIA struggles to satisfy both the potential newcomers and the current crowd. In years gone by I’ve had little faith in those in charge of implementing new rules, but this time around I feel (ever so slightly) confident that Brawn can steady the ship and find the best compromise for everyone. Enjoy the inevitable debate.

Share202Tweet126Share50

Related Posts

Pitbull joins Trackhouse Racing ownership
NASCAR

Pitbull joins Trackhouse Racing ownership

15 hours ago
Insight: Aitken joins Formula 1’s one-off racers
Feature

Insight: Aitken joins Formula 1’s one-off racers

24 hours ago
Andretti to step away from full-time IndyCar racing
IndyCar

Andretti to step away from full-time IndyCar racing

2 days ago
Load More

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You can manage the subscriptions of this post.

  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest
Leclerc says qualifying pace ‘quite promising’ for Ferrari

Technical Insight: Why Ferrari’s new ‘superfast’ Power Unit might not be enough

December 23, 2020
Gallery: Best shots from Hamilton’s Turkish GP title celebrations

Russell’s Mercedes drive ‘horrible timing’ for Hamilton’s negotiations – Webber

January 1, 2021
Feature: Formula 1’s top 10 worst teams, Part One

Feature: Formula 1’s top 10 worst teams, Part One

December 31, 2020
FIA reduces maximum F1 race time to three hours

FIA reduces maximum F1 race time to three hours

3
Barcelona to reprofile Turn 10 for the 2021 season

Barcelona to reprofile Turn 10 for the 2021 season

3
Bottas fastest as Formula 1’s Portuguese GP action begins

Bottas: ‘I’m not Rosberg, I do my talking on track and race fair’

3
Pitbull joins Trackhouse Racing ownership

Pitbull joins Trackhouse Racing ownership

January 16, 2021
Insight: Aitken joins Formula 1’s one-off racers

Insight: Aitken joins Formula 1’s one-off racers

January 16, 2021
Andretti to step away from full-time IndyCar racing

Andretti to step away from full-time IndyCar racing

January 15, 2021
Motorsport Week

© 2020 Motorsport Media Services Ltd

Other Links

  • About & Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Motorsport Monday

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Formula 1
    • Latest News
    • Standings
    • Calendar
    • 2021 Calendar
    • Results
    • 2021 Team/Driver Line-Up
  • Formula E
    • Latest News
    • Standings
    • Calendar
  • MotoGP
    • Latest News
    • Standings
    • Calendar
  • WRC
    • Latest News
    • Standings
    • Calendar
  • IndyCar
    • Latest News
    • Standings
    • Calendar
  • WEC
    • Latest News
    • Calendar
  • Other
    • Formula 2
    • Formula 3
    • Moto2
    • Moto3
    • WSeries
    • DTM
    • IMSA
    • NASCAR
    • Extreme E
    • Dakar
  • Galleries
  • About/Contact
  • Privacy Policy

© 2020 Motorsport Media Services Ltd

Welcome Back!

Sign In with Facebook
OR

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Sign Up with Facebook
OR

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In