Motorsport Week
  • Formula 1
    • 2026 Formula 1 Calendar
    • 2025 Formula 1 Standings
  • Formula E
    • 2025 Formula E Calendar
    • 2025 Formula E Standings
  • IndyCar
    • 2025 IndyCar Calendar
    • 2025 IndyCar Standings
  • WRC
    • 2025 WRC Standings
    • 2025 WRC Calendar
  • MotoGP
    • 2025 MotoGP Calendar
    • 2025 MotoGP Standings
    • Moto2
    • Moto3
  • WEC
    • 2025 WEC Calendar
  • IMSA
    • 2025 IMSA Calendar
  • World SBK
  • More
    • Formula 2
    • Formula 3
    • F1 Academy
    • Moto2
    • Moto3
    • World Superbikes
    • Technical Insight
    • Galleries
    • About/Contact
    • Privacy Policy
No Result
View All Result
  • Formula 1
    • 2026 Formula 1 Calendar
    • 2025 Formula 1 Standings
  • Formula E
    • 2025 Formula E Calendar
    • 2025 Formula E Standings
  • IndyCar
    • 2025 IndyCar Calendar
    • 2025 IndyCar Standings
  • WRC
    • 2025 WRC Standings
    • 2025 WRC Calendar
  • MotoGP
    • 2025 MotoGP Calendar
    • 2025 MotoGP Standings
    • Moto2
    • Moto3
  • WEC
    • 2025 WEC Calendar
  • IMSA
    • 2025 IMSA Calendar
  • World SBK
  • More
    • Formula 2
    • Formula 3
    • F1 Academy
    • Moto2
    • Moto3
    • World Superbikes
    • Technical Insight
    • Galleries
    • About/Contact
    • Privacy Policy
No Result
View All Result
Motorsport Week

Haas title sponsor Rich Energy loses court case over logo

by
7 years ago
A A
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Rich Energy, title sponsor of the Haas F1 Team, has lost a high court battle over its logo, initated by British bicycle brand, Whyte.

Whyte claims that Rich Energy ripped off its logo with a blatant and unauthorised copy and took legal action against the energy drinks company. The court battle concluded with Judge Melissa Clarke ruling in Whyte's favour.

The decision could see Rich Energy forced to change its logo, which features heavily on both Haas F1 cars and sees Whyte entitled to damages or an account of Rich Energy’s profits.

In her ruling, the judge stated that it was her belief that evidence had been "manufactured" by Rich Energy CEO William Storey and graphic design company StaxoWeb Ltd in order to support their defence, and she also accused the pair of lying over their familiarity with Whyte's logo.

RelatedPosts

Charles Leclerc is unsure of what team truly has the best pace so far

Charles Leclerc suspicious on Ferrari F1 rivals’ true pace after Bahrain test

2 hours ago
Edoardo Mortara made it two in two in Jeddah

Edoardo Mortara charges to second consecutive Formula E pole at Jeddah E-Prix

4 hours ago

"I am satisfied that some of Mr Storey’s evidence was incorrect or misleading and that he was involved in the manufacture of documents during the course of litigation to provide additional support for the Defendants’ case. 

"I do not accept either Mr Storey or Mr Kelly as credible or reliable witnesses and I treat all of their evidence with a high degree of caution.

"I am satisfied on the balance of probabilities that both Mr Kelly and Mr Storey have lied about not being familiar with C’s Device (Whyte’s logo). I find it more likely than not that they were familiar with it, and that they directly and knowingly copied C’s Device in designing D1’s Device (Rich Energy’s logo)."

In response to the ruling, Rich Energy issued the following statement in which it says it may appeal the decision.

"Rich Energy are considering to appeal a decision to change their existing logo after a United Kingdom court ruling declared its need to change. The now well-known branding of Rich Energy has been under scrutiny since the brand launched itself as a title sponsor within the global platform of Formula One.

"With over a billion people now watching the Rich Energy brand, the potential requirement to change its logo will not change the company's future programs. Whilst the initial judgement is disappointing, and only applies to the United Kingdom, Rich Energy will now focus on its strong sales growth and commitment to delivering its premium product to current and new markets."

Share202Tweet126Share

Related Posts

Charles Leclerc is unsure of what team truly has the best pace so far
Formula 1

Charles Leclerc suspicious on Ferrari F1 rivals’ true pace after Bahrain test

2 hours ago
Edoardo Mortara made it two in two in Jeddah
Formula E

Edoardo Mortara charges to second consecutive Formula E pole at Jeddah E-Prix

4 hours ago
The second race of the Formula E Jeddah E-Prix double-header has its grid set
Formula E

Formula E 2026 Jeddah E-Prix – Race 2 Qualifying Results

4 hours ago
Load More

Discussion about this post

Latest News

Charles Leclerc is unsure of what team truly has the best pace so far

Charles Leclerc suspicious on Ferrari F1 rivals’ true pace after Bahrain test

February 14, 2026
Edoardo Mortara made it two in two in Jeddah

Edoardo Mortara charges to second consecutive Formula E pole at Jeddah E-Prix

February 14, 2026
The second race of the Formula E Jeddah E-Prix double-header has its grid set

Formula E 2026 Jeddah E-Prix – Race 2 Qualifying Results

February 14, 2026
Motorsport Week

© 2024 Motorsport Media Services Ltd

Other Links

  • About & Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Motorsport Monday

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • Sign Up
  • Home
  • Formula 1
    • Latest News
    • 2025 F1 Calendar
    • 2025 F1 Championship Standings
  • Formula E
    • Latest News
    • 2025 FE Calendar
    • 2025 FE Championship Standings
  • MotoGP
    • Latest News
    • 2025 MotoGP Calendar
    • 2025 MotoGP Standings
    • Moto2
    • Moto3
    • World Superbikes
  • WRC
    • Latest News
    • 2025 WRC Calendar
    • 2025 WRC Standings
  • IndyCar
    • Latest News
    • 2025 IndyCar Calendar
    • 2025 IndyCar Standings
  • WEC
    • Latest News
    • 2025 WEC Calendar
  • Live Updates
  • Other
    • IMSA
    • Formula 2
    • Formula 3
    • F1 Academy
    • Moto2
    • Moto3
    • World Superbikes
  • Galleries
  • About/Contact
  • Privacy Policy

© 2024 Motorsport Media Services Ltd