There’s an old clichè about when you see an opening, you take it, because the window could close at any second.
Well, this summer, Formula 1’s U.S. media rights negotiations feel like that exact moment. The incumbent, ESPN, has doubled the American audience since 2018. Yet, with Liberty Media now fielding offers from Apple and Netflix that nearly double the current deal at $150–200 million a year, the question isn’t just about who’s got the biggest wallet. It’s whether F1, after years of turbo-charged growth stateside, is ready to trade mass reach for a one-time payday.
Are We Hitting the Ceiling?
For the past few years, American F1 growth has bordered on cultural phenomenon with two new races, Miami and Vegas, Gen Z TikToks, and record-breaking U.S. viewership (averaging 1.3 million per race this year, up from just 554,000 in 2018). Throw in a global Netflix series and Brad Pitt’s Hollywood-powered F1 movie (which grossed $300 million in its opening month), and it’s easy to see why the rights are hot.
But here’s the catch: most of that audience came because F1 was everywhere.
On ESPN, on social, on your neighbor’s TV, all with few paywalls or hoops. Now, as tech giants dangle huge offers, F1 faces a classic rights-holder’s dilemma: Money or reach? Take the check, or keep growing your biggest market outside Europe?
The Streaming Paywall Problem
Apple’s rumored $200 million annual offer would shatter F1’s previous benchmarks, however, with Apple TV+ available in only about 11% of American households and a track record of shrinking sports viewership through premium paywalls (see: MLS post–Apple deal), the risk is obvious. Leagues that chase subscription windfalls often see their audience halved overnight. The sport cashes in, but loses cultural presence and casual fans.
That hard pivot to streaming would be a fork in the road.
ESPN and legacy linear media can still blanket households, leverage other high-profile events, and market F1 to millions of Americans who didn’t even know they were fans until they saw a highlight at brunch. Streamers, for all their tech and checkbooks, don’t have that flywheel. The numbers don’t suggest otherwise: MLS games exclusive to Apple are watched by a fraction of the audience they drew on cable.
Production Value Isn’t Enough, You Need a Platform
There’s another overlooked layer here. ESPN has largely opted not to produce original American F1 content, instead relying on Sky Sports coverage that appeals to diehards but sometimes falls flat for casual U.S. fans. The opportunity is obvious: what F1 needs in the States isn’t just better coverage, but a U.S.-centric “total content platform.” As Dr. Obbs said on X, it means real live commentary, trackside reporting, weekly shows, podcasts, and digital storytelling that fits American viewing habits.
The success of NASCAR’s pivot to Prime Video offers a template, but also a warning: get the production right, and incremental fans might stick around. Get it wrong (or lock out the curious altogether), and growth stalls.
The Business Calculation
It’s easy to think Liberty Media is just seeking top dollar. But data tells a more nuanced story:
- F1’s global rights hit $1.1 billion in 2024, while the current ESPN deal for the United States is a measly $85–$90 million annually.
- Apple and Netflix aren’t alone in the bidding war. NBC, Amazon, and others are sniffing around. But as the price tag climbs toward $200 million annually, only tech giants can stomach it, with ESPN “showing fiscal discipline” and likely walking away rather than overpaying.
- The audience size is still significantly behind that of domestic competition. NASCAR draws 2.9 million per race.
However, F1’s growth has largely defined the modern, multi-platform sports business playbook.
The unsaid tension: Is this peak U.S. F1? If so, a high bed is almost a rational, sell at the top for Liberty Media. But if there’s more headroom, and if open access yields exponential gains, why close the door now?
What’s Next—and What’s at Stake
There’s no shortage of suitors or opinions. Tech platforms will offer the biggest checks. Traditional TV can still promise mass reach. And in the background is F1’s own direct-to-consumer F1TV service—a superior product for diehards that could be sidelined if an exclusive mega-streamer deal is inked.
If F1 jumps to a streamer, the league cashes a historic check and dials back U.S. exposure just as the rest of the sports world is struggling with cord-cutting. If it stays with ESPN (regardless of pay), it’s betting it can keep converting the casual, “Drive to Survive” Netflix crowd into full-on race obsessives.
Where F1 lands will reshape its American footprint for a decade. Will it become Formula 1’s NFL moment or MLS rerun? If history is any guide, the answer won’t just be about dollars. It’ll be about how many new fans can even find F1 by 2030, and whether those millions are worth more, long-term, than half a billion in the bank.
READ MORE – Bernie Ecclestone surmises events that led to ‘idiot’ Christian Horner enduring Red Bull axe
READ MORE – Red Bull document indicates potential detail behind Christian Horner dismissal
